Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://repository.khpa.edu.ua//jspui/handle/123456789/3840
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorBelmaz, Yaroslava-
dc.contributor.authorOtroshko, Tamara-
dc.date.accessioned2024-10-31T08:38:35Z-
dc.date.available2024-10-31T08:38:35Z-
dc.date.issued2024-
dc.identifier.urihttp://repository.khpa.edu.ua//jspui/handle/123456789/3840-
dc.descriptionBelmaz Y. The role of peer observation and peer review in the professional formation and development of American and british higher education teachers / Y. Belmaz, T. Otroshko // Проблеми інженерно-педагогічної освіти, 2024. – № 82. – С. 269–274en_US
dc.description.abstractIn the article peer observation and peer review are defined as effective forms of professional development of higher education teachers. For illustrative purpose experience of the USA and Great Britain is given. In defining the concept of "professional development", the works of American and British teachers who use different definitions are analysed: "professional development", "career development", "staff development", etc. It is noted that professional development is usually seen as a process aimed at improving skills through formal or informal learning. Professional development should be related to the needs of the individual and be consistent with the current situation in society and education. The authors emphasise that peer observation and peer evaluation as a form of professional development of higher education teachers are increasingly used in higher education institutions in the USA and the UK, receiving support from organisations involved in improving the quality of learning and teaching in higher education. The paper emphasises that peer observation is not a control or critical evaluation of teaching activities. It is seen as a support system and a means of professional development of the teaching staff. The advantages of peer observation are analysed both for those teachers who are observers and for those whose classes are observed. The authors note that there are formative (developmental) and summative (for solving personnel issues) peer observation. In the process of peer observation, three stages can be distinguished: preparatory (instruction), observation as such, or attendance at a class, and final (feedback and analysis). The article analyses all of these stages in detail, emphasising the importance of each of them. Particular emphasis is placed on feedback, without which it is impossible to achieve the effectiveness of peer observation. As an example, the article provides recommendations for visiting, observing and analysing classes during a peer observation at Keele University and the Center for Effective Learning and Teaching at North Carolina State University.en_US
dc.subjectвзаємовідвідування, взаємоспостереження, взаємооцінювання, викладач вищої школи, професійний розвиток, зворотній зв’язок, США, Велика Британіяen_US
dc.subjectpeer observation, peer review, peer evaluation, higher education teacher, professional development, feedback, the USA, Great Britainen_US
dc.titleThe role of peer observation and peer review in the professional formation and development of American and british higher education teachersen_US
Appears in Collections:Статті

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
+Belmaz+Y.+Otroshko+T..pdf286.92 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.